From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: top-repl priority of guile module Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 08:59:22 +1100 Message-ID: <87ejrj2s79.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165010398 14019 80.91.229.2 (1 Dec 2006 21:59:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 01 22:59:51 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqGPw-00083O-2Z for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:59:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqGPv-0007PW-GX for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:59:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GqGPt-0007PQ-DC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:59:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GqGPr-0007O1-8L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:59:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqGPq-0007Nq-Sw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:59:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.2.215] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GqGPq-0004tU-NG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:59:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ABD5A7FDC for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:59:28 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp222A.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.34.42]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181D18C0C for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:59:28 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GqGPi-0002uk-Fp for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 08:59:22 +1100 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6272 Archived-At: Sven Hartrumpf on guile-user a while ago reported on a run of guile --use-srfi=1 leaves the REPL with the core `iota', not the srfi-1 one. What's the theory behind this bit of top-repl (in boot-9.scm), ;; so that builtin bindings will be checked first (module-use! guile-user-module (resolve-interface '(ice-9 r5rs))) (module-use! guile-user-module (resolve-interface '(guile))) The effect is to override any bindings that srfi modules attempt to replace. So srfi-17 car or srfi-39 current-input-port are similarly afflicted. I'm thinking of removing that last line (module-use! guile-user-module (resolve-interface '(guile))) to stop the core being elevated. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel