From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Using define in multiple threads? Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:33:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87ej163ifs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3ae3aa420811161427t6b2c65d1q4adcd6e9a5689ddc@mail.gmail.com> <87od0ee6yl.fsf@gnu.org> <87od0dl4hy.fsf@gnu.org> <49dd78620811191536o5ead332bt7dbc60128fd33957@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227170050 13520 80.91.229.12 (20 Nov 2008 08:34:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:34:10 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 20 09:35:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L350J-0001xA-Ra for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:35:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57670 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L34zA-0008Cn-TR for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:34:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L34z5-0008CD-CR for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:33:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L34z3-0008Bv-QL for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:33:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43768 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L34z3-0008Br-Nf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:33:53 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:57141 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L34z3-00050b-D7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:33:53 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L34z0-0007jO-Cb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:33:50 +0000 Original-Received: from 193.50.110.60 ([193.50.110.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:33:50 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by 193.50.110.60 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:33:50 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.50.110.60 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 30 Brumaire an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:T/jiUR5zPt6QIhqDwsM22Ofmd9I= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7866 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > On Thu 20 Nov 2008 00:36, "Neil Jerram" writes: > >> 2008/11/18 Ludovic Courtès : >>> >>> I submitted a bug: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?24867 . I'm >>> not sure whether this can easily be fixed in 1.8, since that would >>> require adding a mutex to `module-type' and access it from C, which >>> would break the ABI. Ideas? >> >> Where exactly is the troublesome hash table? (There's a lot of code >> underneath scm_m_define(), so if you've already tracked it down, that >> would save a little time.) > > Don't know myself exactly, but I assume this is referring to the > module-obarray. Exactly. Ludo'.