From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: fmatch Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:08:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87eih1xdt1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201005062239.32992.stefan.tampe@spray.se> <201005172208.00094.stefan.tampe@spray.se> <87wruvbqen.fsf@gnu.org> <201005231747.23855.stefan.tampe@spray.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274731830 26412 80.91.229.12 (24 May 2010 20:10:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 20:10:30 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 24 22:10:29 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGdyl-0007A2-QW for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:10:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37429 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGdyl-0006CL-5m for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:10:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34771 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGdxk-0005YI-Tf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:09:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGdxd-0007ti-6I for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:09:24 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGdxc-0007t6-MI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:09:17 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGdxX-0006OA-Sr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:09:11 +0200 Original-Received: from acces.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:09:11 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by acces.bordeaux.inria.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:09:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ connect(): No such file or directory Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acces.bordeaux.inria.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 5 Prairial an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q2toeXrBhcVYMQhpU/aaLqwmDio= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10360 Archived-At: Hello! stefan writes: > On Saturday 22 May 2010 11:03:12 pm Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi! >> >> stefan writes: >> > Shall we say that we use the slightly modified version of (ice-9 match) >> > that ypu dug up for now! >> >> Hmm, yes? Please send an actual patch against Guile master, so we have >> something concrete do discuss. :-) > > In this mail a patch is made for discussions. It's not upstream ready > but intended for further discussions. Thanks! Your patch inserts a modified version of Shinn’s match as (ice-9 match). I’d prefer to have the upstream version unmodified, say as ‘match.upstream.scm’, and have ‘match.scm’ just ‘include-from-path’ that file, along with defining any necessary macros for compatibility (see, e.g., how ‘sxml/ssax.scm’ does that.) Could you look into it? Thanks, Ludo’.