From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Using libunistring for string comparisons et al
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:46:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ei6csb85.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87zkp1p84m.fsf@netris.org
Hello!
Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:
> I claim that any reasonable code which currently uses string-ref and
> string-set! could be more cleanly written using string ports or
> string-{fold,unfold}{,-right}.
I agree, and we should encourage this. However...
I find Cowan’s proposal for string iteration and the R6RS editors
response interesting:
http://www.r6rs.org/formal-comments/comment-235.txt
I also think strings should remain what they currently are, with O(1)
random access.
I think anything beyond that may require a new API, perhaps with a new
data type, which would deserve a SRFI with wider discussion.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-12 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-11 0:54 uc_tolower (uc_toupper (x)) Mike Gran
2011-03-11 22:33 ` Using libunistring for string comparisons et al Mark H Weaver
2011-03-11 22:36 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-11 23:09 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-12 13:46 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2011-03-12 17:28 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-13 21:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-03-30 9:05 ` Andy Wingo
2011-03-13 4:05 ` O(1) accessors for UTF-8 backed strings Mark H Weaver
2011-03-13 4:42 ` Alex Shinn
2011-03-15 15:46 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-16 0:07 ` Alex Shinn
2011-03-19 13:02 ` Andy Wingo
2011-03-30 9:20 ` Andy Wingo
2011-03-30 9:03 ` Using libunistring for string comparisons et al Andy Wingo
2011-03-31 14:19 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-03-12 13:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-12 21:28 Mike Gran
2011-03-15 17:20 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-15 20:39 ` Mike Gran
2011-03-15 22:49 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-16 0:01 ` Mike Gran
2011-03-16 1:12 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-16 11:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-03-17 15:38 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-17 15:56 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-03-17 17:58 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-18 0:10 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2011-03-18 1:38 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-18 8:46 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2011-03-18 12:05 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-20 22:12 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-03-30 10:14 ` Andy Wingo
2011-03-17 21:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-03-19 12:31 ` Andy Wingo
2011-03-19 14:06 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-19 14:53 ` Noah Lavine
2011-03-19 15:49 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-19 15:08 ` Andy Wingo
2011-03-19 19:43 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-19 16:37 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-03-20 21:49 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-03-30 9:50 ` Andy Wingo
2011-03-29 12:39 ` Peter Brett
2011-03-29 13:35 ` Andy Wingo
2011-03-29 21:15 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-03-31 14:59 ` Peter Brett
2011-03-31 20:12 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-03-30 9:33 ` Andy Wingo
2011-03-16 0:22 ` Alex Shinn
2011-03-16 1:30 Mike Gran
2011-03-16 2:03 Mike Gran
2011-03-16 15:22 Mike Gran
2011-03-16 16:58 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-03-17 18:07 Mike Gran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ei6csb85.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).