From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 22:24:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87ehqlkxa6.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87ehqxzke9.fsf@gnu.org> <87lil4vz9g.fsf@gnu.org> <87k40fszd5.fsf@gnu.org> <87likureni.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337113494 24153 80.91.229.3 (15 May 2012 20:24:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 15 22:24:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SUOIY-00042S-Pq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 22:24:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43907 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUOIY-0001Rz-5U for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUOIU-0001QY-Oz for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUOIS-0001bi-9q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:42 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:39779 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUOIS-0001YY-1C; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:40 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58425A6CA; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:37 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=bSUG6FHXHWNXbFPv0MMaLB+7wKc=; b=AQyfZe wVKLk1mP0KAvRhuAwKEOG1NH4xc2hHQCdv0+EoijuJ2m1oFfNZRqQHnX6/ANmd3e y8XJsfj3JX2jn5iPAUxE1SWhTf8tZF4ultMAq1tcmw0X/7qUcBYTFc4a0ucozVR4 e/nlqQ/ASGQcYi6QxeMXVmRRUg6724Um86tTg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xzNTuiVFPQQs96l8m+AcZZY7zr9OSRUZ aGb702suUGI7YXOApbHa2UM+/DgcKcWhLUx8UVK89SznIr3sRcgW3xNU0hF4IXuy FJA5o3rgx06OZmmAWN/WJqjmC1WJH8MpaFOo6CdfNQhFrvK00D0ywblS7u6lAkNS 75GUZy9b9rY= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513ECA6C9; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A03C5A6C8; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:24:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Mon, 14 May 2012 11:14:23 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FD9B0AF0-9ECB-11E1-8A94-E981AF15ED39-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14448 Archived-At: On Mon 14 May 2012 17:14, Noah Lavine writes: > I think of our current situation as having three top-level lists of > functionality, in API Reference, Guile Modules, and Standard Library. > How about just merging them into one list? It would be quite a big list. Would that be OK? For me the difference is that nodes of "API reference" describe functionality that is often not segregated in modules, whereas "Guile Modules" has nodes that describe modules. What if we merge "Guile Modules" and "Standard Library" into one "Standard Library" node, and keep "API Reference" as it is? Andy -- http://wingolog.org/