From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do you recognize these modules? Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:53:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87ehq8od4e.fsf@gnuvola.org> References: <87zk9r8p1s.fsf@gnuvola.org> <8762bz89zg.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87r4unszj2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k40eg0k1.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87mx59kxqw.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337935923 12051 80.91.229.3 (25 May 2012 08:52:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 08:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 25 10:52:02 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SXqFc-0003mM-Fy for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:52:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33367 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXqFc-0006zR-7S for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:52:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXqFY-0006zH-Dr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:51:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXqFS-0004Xw-B8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:51:55 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp207.alice.it ([82.57.200.103]:44190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXqFM-0004WA-F7; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:51:44 -0400 Original-Received: from ambire (79.21.51.247) by smtp207.alice.it (8.6.023.02) id 4F05A66510262832; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:51:33 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SXqHC-0000lh-2p; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:53:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mx59kxqw.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 15 May 2012 22:14:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.103 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14510 Archived-At: () Andy Wingo () Tue, 15 May 2012 22:14:31 +0200 2.0 is the current stable branch, so any changes should go there first. If it's a build fix or some other fix related to forward-compatibility with 2.0, it can go on 1.8 as well. We should avoid adding interfaces to 1.8, though. When in doubt, it's best (and much appreciated) to mail the list. If no one responds in a few days, go ahead and push it of course. Does that sound sensible to you? Yes, thanks for explaining. To avoid mishap (for this particular task), i've published a tarball: http://www.gnuvola.org/software/guile/doc-xfer-2012-05-25.tar.xz It contains documentation for 17 ice-9 modules, plus some macros (see README). I hope it can be useful for Guile 1.8+ maintenance.