Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Bindings to *at functions

["Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>]

Hi Maxime,

First, apologies for the embarrassingly-long silence…

Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:

> This is a v2 of
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2021-03/msg0026.html,
> with a lot more tests, a few less functions and more consistent documentation.
> ‘rename-file-at’ has been modified to support #f as one of the two directory
> arguments, denoting the current working directory.
>
> Maxime Devos (14):
>   Allow file ports in ‘chdir’ when supported.
>   Allow file ports in ‘readlink’.
>   Allow file ports in ‘utime’.
>   Define ‘symlinkat’ wrapper when supported.
>   Define bindings to ‘mkdirat’ when the C function exists.
>   Correct documentation of ‘mkdir’ w.r.t. the umask.
>   Define AT_REMOVEDIR and others when available.
>   Define a Scheme binding to ‘renameat’ when it exists.
>   Define a Scheme binding to ‘fchmodat’ when it exists.
>   Define a Scheme binding to ‘unlinkat’ when it exists.
>   Define a Scheme binding to ‘fchownat’ when it exists.
>   Define a Scheme binding to ‘fstatat’ when available.
>   Define Scheme bindings to ‘openat’ when available.
>   Update NEWS.

I applied the whole series locally, skimmed over the patches, ran the
tests, and it all LGTM.

I think the strategy to accept a string or a port where applicable
(utime, readlink) makes sense and is consistent with existing
interfaces; the new *at procedures look fine as well (there’s a naming
scheme discrepancy with ‘rename-file-at’ and ‘delete-file-at’, but I
think it’s fine: it’s just an evolution of the discrepancy that was
already there with ‘delete-file’ and ‘rename-file’.)

Copyright for Guile code is assigned to the FSF.  I’d like to offer you
to do the same if that’s an option for you (I’ll send you the details
off-list.)  This would add another delay, but hopefully a short one.

Thank you!

Ludo’.