From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:25:08 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87d6xw3cjf.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016807277 15172 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2002 14:27:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16oQ1N-0003wa-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:27:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oQ15-0005pX-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:27:39 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oPyf-0005hX-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:25:09 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9834423; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:25:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C1501DC3; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:25:08 -0600 (CST) Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Thu, 21 Mar 2002 22:35:11 -0800") Original-Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:151 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:151 Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > how about promote devel/ out of guile-core/ entirely? it is generally > not related to any specific branch. bugs housekeeping is part of the > development effort, after all... Hmm. I think I can see the motivation, but I can also see the value in having a "complete tree" so that people who grab CVS and want to hack have all that info on hand. Not sure. Would we still ship updated versions of these files at release time (as I've suggested for BUGS), or omit them entirely? > might as well specify a known format, how about rfc822? it's time to > see how well the elisp translation machinery holds up to rfc822.el > (moderately hairy load IMHO). if not, someone will check in rfc822.scm > soon i'm sure. Very sneaky :> I like it... On a semi-related note, and FWIW, eventually I'd like to be able to manipulate the bug system via email (gpg signed perhaps), and perhaps also via the web. But for now, I think we'd be fine with just some slight improvements. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel