From: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: The Guile license and the use of LGPL libs (like GMP).
Date: 28 May 2002 21:54:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d6vgt5dx.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CF3DCDD.D0CB1662@pacbell.net>
Bruce Korb <bkorb@pacbell.net> writes:
> > Yep, this occured to me... but which one should be plain "libguile"?
>
> The one without new restrictions.
Yes that seems to be the best choice. (Although I was hoping that we
could find an argument that let's us use the nicer "libguile" for the
'best' library.) We would also need to add an option to guile-config,
no?
Anyway, I'm sure we can find a good solution that doesn't turn
libguile into a trap for people that want the exception.
> > The one with GMP or the one without? Also, we already have API
> > variants: with or without threads, with or without heavy-weight
> > debugging support. Maybe we should give distinct names to them also?
>
> If there are usage constraints, yes. Otherwise, it's a config
> issue. "Does the library support function X?" is a fundamentally
> different question than, "Am I allowed to link with the library at all?"
Yes, agreed. Good point.
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-28 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-09 20:17 Project: a good floating point printer/reader Marius Vollmer
2002-05-13 21:01 ` Rob Browning
2002-05-15 18:30 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-05-16 15:35 ` The Guile license and the use of LGPL libs (like GMP) Rob Browning
2002-05-16 16:44 ` Greg Troxel
2002-05-16 17:01 ` Bruce Korb
2002-05-16 17:12 ` Rob Browning
2002-05-21 19:55 ` Carl R. Witty
2002-05-21 23:44 ` Rob Browning
2002-05-16 17:21 ` Jeff Read
2002-05-16 17:22 ` Rob Browning
2002-05-16 20:40 ` Jeff Read
2002-05-16 23:17 ` Rob Browning
2002-05-16 23:35 ` Jeff Read
2002-05-17 0:02 ` Rob Browning
2002-05-28 18:56 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-05-28 18:28 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-05-28 18:54 ` Bruce Korb
2002-05-28 19:23 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-05-28 19:39 ` Bruce Korb
2002-05-28 19:54 ` Marius Vollmer [this message]
2002-05-28 20:16 ` Bruce Korb
2002-06-01 16:01 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-05-28 19:02 ` Rob Browning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d6vgt5dx.fsf@zagadka.ping.de \
--to=mvo@zagadka.ping.de \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).