From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Cc: Bruce Korb <bkorb@veritas.com>, marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de
Subject: Re: guile-1.6.5 is even worse -- on Linux, no less
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:17:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d5xdbe00.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87oehjm5p9.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Sun, 28 Nov 2004 06:50:58 +1100")
Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au> writes:
> Looks like libtool's lt-guile uninstalled binary gets a NEEDED record
> for libguile-ltdl.so.1 but no rpath to it. Not sure if that NEEDED is
> meant to be there, it's only a sub-dependency of libguile.so.
>
> Adding ../libguile-ltdl/libguile-ltdl.la explicitly into the guile
> program link seems to help.
I hit this same problem today while testing a build on a Debian amd64
machine. I still don't know why the problem shows up on some machines
and not others, but as you suggest, modifying libguile/Makefile.am to
add a direct dependency on libguile-ltdl seems to fix the problem,
i.e.:
guile_LDADD = libguile.la @abs_top_builddir@/libguile-ltdl/libguile-ltdl.la
So unless there are objections, I'll commit this to 1.6.
It would be interesting to see if the latest libtool behaves the same
way. I have libtool 1.5.6 here (from Debian unstable), but the
upstream has released 1.5.10.
Oh, and Marius, unless you think I've misdiagnosed, I'll probably also
revert the addition of libguile-ltdl to subdirs_with_ltlibs in
pre-inst-guile.in. Since these dirs are only added to the
LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH, and since LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH only affects
libguile-ltdl, and since there are no lt_dlopened libs in
libguile-ltdl, it seems like libguile-ltdl probably doesn't belong in
subdirs_with_ltlibs.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-14 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-31 18:35 guile-1.6.5 is even worse -- on Linux, no less Bruce Korb
2004-10-31 18:45 ` Bruce Korb
2004-11-27 19:50 ` Kevin Ryde
2004-12-14 6:17 ` Rob Browning [this message]
2004-12-15 22:52 ` Kevin Ryde
2004-12-22 16:45 ` Marius Vollmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d5xdbe00.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org \
--to=rlb@defaultvalue.org \
--cc=bkorb@veritas.com \
--cc=marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).