From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: module GC bug Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:10:07 +0300 Message-ID: <87d5oe91y8.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <42A8D188.20007@xs4all.nl> <878xzma4o6.fsf@zagadka.de> <42EE01CD.3040409@xs4all.nl> <87hddxa0ip.fsf@zagadka.de> <87y872zrb5.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1124151073 19959 80.91.229.2 (16 Aug 2005 00:11:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 16 02:11:10 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E4p2O-0004AF-G1 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:10:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E4p5m-0006Sf-OL for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E4p5U-0006NL-Mv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:13:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E4p5R-0006MZ-0D for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E4p5Q-0006M9-SJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:13:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.37] (helo=smtp1.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E4pHN-00033T-6j for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp1.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 867597FC15 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:10:14 +0300 (EEST) Original-Received: (qmail 678 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Aug 2005 00:10:07 -0000 Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87y872zrb5.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:57:50 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5191 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5191 Rob Browning writes: > Marius Vollmer writes: > >> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: >> >>> Yes, I've already done that. Any idea of when we will see this in a >>> release? >> >> As soon as Rob gets around to do it! :-) > > Hmm. Did I misunderstand. I thought your previous message said > that this was too big a change for the 1.6 series. Only part of it. The following change in 1.6 makes Han-Wen's life much somewhat easier, I think: 2005-06-10 Han-Wen Nienhuys * gc.c (scm_init_storage): make scm_stand_in_procs a weak_key hash table. This means that procedure properties are GC'd if the procedure dies. > Or did you mean that you want to gear up for a 1.8 release now? Not really, tho there is 'only' the thread-robustness review to be done and we might think about doing it after 1.8 since it will probably need no changes to the API... -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel