From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:32:02 +0000 Message-ID: <87d5jxtpbx.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87pspch28a.fsf_-_@laas.fr> <87zmo4jny6.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87acg0maxs.fsf@zagadka.de> <8764q6kkyv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r78p3h8u.fsf@zagadka.de> <87mzj4wkz9.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87d5jzu627.fsf@laas.fr> <87acf3wjvj.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87hd9alo49.fsf@laas.fr> <87d5jyuoqm.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <20051216061333.GA12479@www.trapp.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134724382 27119 80.91.229.2 (16 Dec 2005 09:13:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 16 10:12:49 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnBdi-0007u0-2B for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:12:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnBd4-0007XN-94 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:11:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EnB2k-0004Ui-UI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EnB2g-0004UD-UW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:34:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnB2e-0004Tu-Bk for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:34:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EnB50-0005FQ-UG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:36:43 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (host86-129-132-201.range86-129.btcentralplus.com [86.129.132.201]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46F6409FEF; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260266F719; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:32:03 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: tomas@tuxteam.de (Tomas Zerolo) In-Reply-To: <20051216061333.GA12479@www.trapp.net> (Tomas Zerolo's message of "Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:13:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5530 Archived-At: tomas@tuxteam.de (Tomas Zerolo) writes: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:47:13PM +0000, Neil Jerram wrote: >> ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: >>=20 >> > OTOH, http://community.schemewiki.org/?variable-naming-convention >> > suggests a different naming convention. >>=20 >> Now that really is a horrible convention. Hmm, how can we best >> confuse someone coming to Scheme from another language for the first >> time? > > To be fair, they seem just to be reporting on current use (which is an > useful service). I wasn't criticising the people who compiled the Wiki page; it's a very useful page. I'm specifically casting aspersions on the idea of the apparent `$name' convention for fluids. Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel