From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Courtès)
To: "Kjetil S. Matheussen" <k.s.matheussen@notam02.no>
Cc: Bill Schottstaedt <bil@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>, guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Experience with guile + Boehm GC in SND (Re: New versions of rt-compiler.scm, rt-examples.scm and rt.tex
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:22:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d50bq2gz.fsf@laas.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706041353330.9033@ttleush> (Kjetil S. Matheussen's message of "Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:08:32 +0200 (CEST)")
Hi,
"Kjetil S. Matheussen" <k.s.matheussen@notam02.no> writes:
> Yes, but for some kinds of software, like programs with custom gui's,
> sound processing programs, interactive graphical programs,
> interactivety is exclusively more important than those two. I consider
> the freeze that the guile's built-in gc cause to be its biggest
> problem.
>
> In fact, I don't think execution time is an important factor here at
> all. Don't get me wrong, of course execution time is important in
> general, but a change in execution time of a gc benchmark program
> within the factor of two sounds like an insignificant difference
> compared to what is gained in interactivity.
Right, "interactivity" may be an important metric for some classes of
applications, albeit one that can sometimes be hard to capture. That
said, I guess a "large fraction" of Guile users will be even more
concerned about memory consumption and execution time.
> I'm going to run Guile + Boehm GC + SND for a while now and report
> back if anything unusual happens. I might even release a special
> version of SND with guile + the Boehm GC included to the public in the
> near future, because of the huge advantages it has. This might
> generate a lot of feedback. And if no one reports back, then its a
> good sign that it works well.
Alright, I'll wait for bug reports. ;-)
> Actually, I haven't used guile for other interactive stuff than
> snd. And snd is huge. It could be that the boehm gc works a lot lot
> better for really large programs than guile's gc. I'll try to run the
> gc benchmark program inside snd (with lots of scheme files loaded), it
> might give some interesting results.
Cool, let us know how it goes.
I'll probably sync my `boehm-gc' branch with HEAD one of these days, too
(I think it doesn't lack a lot of upstream changes anyway).
Thanks!
Ludovic.
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-04 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706031204540.9006@ttleush>
[not found] ` <20070603110930.M29119@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
2007-06-03 14:57 ` Experience with guile + Boehm GC in SND (Re: New versions of rt-compiler.scm, rt-examples.scm and rt.tex Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen
2007-06-03 16:33 ` Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen
2007-06-03 20:07 ` Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen
2007-06-04 11:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-06-04 12:08 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 12:45 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 13:22 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2007-06-04 16:11 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 16:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-06-04 18:00 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 18:14 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-05 7:53 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d50bq2gz.fsf@laas.fr \
--to=ludovic.courtes@laas.fr \
--cc=bil@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=k.s.matheussen@notam02.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).