From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:24:28 +0000 Message-ID: <87d4tbvhqr.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <8763zc3htd.fsf@pobox.com> <87prxfzsb2.fsf@chbouib.org> <873aubbtlz.fsf@gkar.rotty.yi.org> <87odcxnuk2.fsf@chbouib.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197487494 6781 80.91.229.12 (12 Dec 2007 19:24:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 12 20:25:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J2XCZ-0001pS-7C for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:25:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2XCH-0001kv-77 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:24:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J2XCB-0001iP-3w for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:24:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J2XC9-0001fY-1G for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:24:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2XC8-0001fT-Ov for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:24:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J2XC5-0002ao-JJ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:24:33 -0500 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-145-183-175.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.183.175]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C241F6D00; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:24:30 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from laruns (unknown [192.168.0.10]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7909F3800A; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:24:30 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87odcxnuk2.fsf@chbouib.org> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?s's?= message of "Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:02:37 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6927 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > Hi Andreas, > > Andreas Rottmann writes: > >> You should probably also have a look at the Scheme-Level FFI of PLT >> Scheme[1], and my reimplementation for Scheme 48[2]. > > Thanks for the links, that's the kind of think I had in mind. Perhaps > you'd like to port S42 to Guile as well? :-) >From a _very_ quick look, my impression is that the PLT FFI is about equivalent in complexity and function to what the code generation side of G-Wrap provides. If that's correct, then the key practical difference is that G-Wrap does everything at build/compile time, where PLT FFI does everything at runtime -- in which case, surely G-Wrap is the better option? Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel