From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Why bother porting Guile to BDW-GC? Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:28:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87d4h1qrem.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87skq2jjl4.fsf@gnu.org> <49dd78620811101257p7eb949e7t47042347f81249eb@mail.gmail.com> <87skpyrpka.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1226478565 18498 80.91.229.12 (12 Nov 2008 08:29:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:29:25 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 12 09:30:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L0B7K-0001yO-8j for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:30:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58116 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L0B6C-0004SL-Bb for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:29:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L0B69-0004SG-9I for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:29:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L0B66-0004S4-QE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:29:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47241 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L0B66-0004S1-KO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:29:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:11435) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0B66-0007n3-2L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:29:10 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0B65-0003MD-Dz for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:29:09 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L0B60-0003KX-O6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:29:04 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:29:04 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:29:04 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 22 Brumaire an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:z75LgRNOiuofDBRN8AsskLzfLTA= X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7835 Archived-At: Hi, Andy Wingo writes: > Some benchmarking would be really nice ;-) > > Like these for example: > > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/will/Twobit/benchmarksAbout.html Yes, see, e.g., http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/7803 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/7803/focus=7810 The GC benchmarks used by Lars Hansen in his PhD and referred to in the above message are already in the Git tree. I'll report about them ASAP. Thanks, Ludo'.