From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: vm status update Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:40:56 +0000 Message-ID: <87d4creiyv.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87ab7ys2qi.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236569845 6376 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2009 03:37:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 03:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 09 04:38:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from terminus-est.gnu.org ([66.92.78.210] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LgWK4-0005qv-0g for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:38:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44228 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LgWIi-0007hV-0Y for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LgWIe-0007e4-GG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LgWIc-0007ZM-U3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52654 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LgWIc-0007Yv-Fb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:39250) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LgWIU-0000or-FI; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LgRiU-0001v9-Ol; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:43:30 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-157-180-39.range86-157.btcentralplus.com [86.157.180.39]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30ABD1F6703; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:40:58 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from arudy.ossau.uklinux.net (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78523801E; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:40:56 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87ab7ys2qi.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22's?= message of "Fri\, 06 Mar 2009 23\:31\:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8249 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: >> Anyway, that's where I am. Bug-wise we still have a bug in backtraces, >> which I need to pin down at some point, and update docs -- but generally >> speaking we're mergeable. What do people think, should I be working on >> master at some point? > > Sure. Neil: what do you think? No problem, I'm happy for Andy to merge now. (When I mentioned holding off before, that was while I was looking at branch_release-1-8..master differences, and I have the results of that saved off somewhere.) > Looking at `vm', it's been sometime > since the last merge with `master', so it'd be worth checking that > things still work. I guess that would mean merging master into vm first, and checking that, then merging vm into master. Regards, Neil