* struct displacements
@ 2010-01-25 0:33 Andy Wingo
2010-01-25 13:44 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Wingo @ 2010-01-25 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guile-devel
Hello Ludovic,
- GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2*sizeof(scm_t_bits)); /* for the self data pointer */
- GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2*sizeof(scm_t_bits)
- + scm_tc3_struct); /* for the vtable data pointer */
+ /* The first word of a struct is equal to `SCM_STRUCT_DATA (vtable) +
+ scm_tc3_struct', and `SCM_STRUCT_DATA (vtable)' is 2 words after VTABLE by
+ default. */
+ GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2 * sizeof (scm_t_bits) + scm_tc3_struct);
I'm pretty sure the first case is still needed, for instance
reallocation. It is, as the comment indicates, "for the self data
pointer" -- the second word of the object, which normally points to the
third word of the object, but for reallocated instances points to the
third word of *another* object. See my article on redefining classes for
more info.
Can you change this?
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: struct displacements
2010-01-25 0:33 struct displacements Andy Wingo
@ 2010-01-25 13:44 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-01-25 14:55 ` Andy Wingo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2010-01-25 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Wingo; +Cc: guile-devel
Hello,
Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> writes:
> - GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2*sizeof(scm_t_bits)); /* for the self data pointer */
> - GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2*sizeof(scm_t_bits)
> - + scm_tc3_struct); /* for the vtable data pointer */
> + /* The first word of a struct is equal to `SCM_STRUCT_DATA (vtable) +
> + scm_tc3_struct', and `SCM_STRUCT_DATA (vtable)' is 2 words after VTABLE by
> + default. */
> + GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2 * sizeof (scm_t_bits) + scm_tc3_struct);
>
> I'm pretty sure the first case is still needed, for instance
> reallocation. It is, as the comment indicates, "for the self data
> pointer" -- the second word of the object, which normally points to the
> third word of the object, but for reallocated instances points to the
> third word of *another* object.
As an excuse, the comment was a bit too terse for me to understand, but
I get your point now. However, it’s still unclear to me how an ‘s’
field can point to something else than “self”.
> See my article on redefining classes for more info.
By ‘self’ here, did you mean what’s known as ‘data’ on the diagrams at
<http://wingolog.org/archives/2009/11/09/class-redefinition-in-guile>?
Thanks!
Ludo’.
PS: It would be really cool if this blog post were part of the “Data
Representation” node of the manual. :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: struct displacements
2010-01-25 13:44 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2010-01-25 14:55 ` Andy Wingo
2010-01-25 23:10 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Wingo @ 2010-01-25 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guile-devel
Hi Ludo' :)
On Mon 25 Jan 2010 14:44, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> - GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2*sizeof(scm_t_bits)); /* for the self data pointer */
>> - GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2*sizeof(scm_t_bits)
>> - + scm_tc3_struct); /* for the vtable data pointer */
>> + /* The first word of a struct is equal to `SCM_STRUCT_DATA (vtable) +
>> + scm_tc3_struct', and `SCM_STRUCT_DATA (vtable)' is 2 words after VTABLE by
>> + default. */
>> + GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2 * sizeof (scm_t_bits) + scm_tc3_struct);
>>
>> I'm pretty sure the first case is still needed, for instance
>> reallocation. It is, as the comment indicates, "for the self data
>> pointer" -- the second word of the object, which normally points to the
>> third word of the object, but for reallocated instances points to the
>> third word of *another* object.
>
> As an excuse, the comment was a bit too terse for me to understand, but
> I get your point now. However, it’s still unclear to me how an ‘s’
> field can point to something else than “self”.
Hm, I think you're right; the wording was not only terse but misleading.
It is "for the data pointer, which might point to another object's
data", or something like that. Nothing to do with `s' fields.
>> See my article on redefining classes for more info.
>
> By ‘self’ here, did you mean what’s known as ‘data’ on the diagrams at
> <http://wingolog.org/archives/2009/11/09/class-redefinition-in-guile>?
Yes indeed.
> PS: It would be really cool if this blog post were part of the “Data
> Representation” node of the manual. :-)
Heh, yeah. That whole chapter needs revision...
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: struct displacements
2010-01-25 14:55 ` Andy Wingo
@ 2010-01-25 23:10 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2010-01-25 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Wingo; +Cc: guile-devel
Hey,
Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> writes:
> On Mon 25 Jan 2010 14:44, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> writes:
>>
>>> - GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2*sizeof(scm_t_bits)); /* for the self data pointer */
>>> - GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2*sizeof(scm_t_bits)
>>> - + scm_tc3_struct); /* for the vtable data pointer */
>>> + /* The first word of a struct is equal to `SCM_STRUCT_DATA (vtable) +
>>> + scm_tc3_struct', and `SCM_STRUCT_DATA (vtable)' is 2 words after VTABLE by
>>> + default. */
>>> + GC_REGISTER_DISPLACEMENT (2 * sizeof (scm_t_bits) + scm_tc3_struct);
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure the first case is still needed, for instance
>>> reallocation. It is, as the comment indicates, "for the self data
>>> pointer" -- the second word of the object, which normally points to the
>>> third word of the object, but for reallocated instances points to the
>>> third word of *another* object.
>>
>> As an excuse, the comment was a bit too terse for me to understand, but
>> I get your point now. However, it’s still unclear to me how an ‘s’
>> field can point to something else than “self”.
>
> Hm, I think you're right; the wording was not only terse but misleading.
> It is "for the data pointer, which might point to another object's
> data", or something like that. Nothing to do with `s' fields.
OK, done:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=227eff6a77dd58d64775fe91ae0f1596bfe3371b
Thanks,
Ludo'.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-25 23:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-25 0:33 struct displacements Andy Wingo
2010-01-25 13:44 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-01-25 14:55 ` Andy Wingo
2010-01-25 23:10 ` Ludovic Courtès
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).