From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix hanging of popen.test Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:11:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87d3v9irhy.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <1276210496-6477-1-git-send-email-neil@ossau.uklinux.net> <87vd9p5p07.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <871vbq25if.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277838680 6113 80.91.229.12 (29 Jun 2010 19:11:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 29 21:11:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTgDC-0008GZ-Kb for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:11:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51988 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OTgDC-0002K1-0P for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39385 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OTgD7-0002JP-P1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTgD6-0004yF-HU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:11:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:33511) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTgD6-0004xx-5H for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (unknown [78.149.160.158]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1B51F6918; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:11:06 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy (unknown [192.168.11.8]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B8438013; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:11:05 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:31:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10589 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > Hi Neil, Hi, and thanks for the quick reply. > This is not a known problem to me, and the build has not changed; > however it seems you are working on an old revision. Some things changed > in the past that required a clean build. I'm sure the tree is up to date, and I've already done a complete rebuild. >> neil@arudy:~/SW/Guile/master$ GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 ./meta/uninstalled-env guile -c '(+ 3 3)' >> `scm_trampoline_1' is deprecated. Just use `scm_call_1' instead. > > This is fishy; nothing in current code calls scm_trampoline_1. Aha... Time for strace then, which includes: open("/home/neil/SW/Guile/master/module/srfi/srfi-1.scm", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 10 open("/usr/local/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-4.la", O_RDONLY) = 11 open("/usr/local/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-4.so.4", O_RDONLY) = 11 open("/usr/local/lib/libguile.so.18", O_RDONLY) = 11 even though the real libguile was loaded well before then: open("/home/neil/SW/Guile/master/libguile/.libs/libguile-2.0.so.18", O_RDONLY) = 3 So the problem appears to be srfi-1.scm picking up something old from /usr/local/lib. I'll dig deeper. >> am/snarf:5: AM_V_SNARF_$(V: non-POSIX variable name > > Yes, they are harmless warnings. You don't get these warnings with > automake 1.11. Thanks, I'll upgrade. > FWIW I'm going to not be around very much until sometime next week, so > apologies in advance for delayed replies :) No problem, I think you've already provided enough clue for me to make progress! Neil