From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: Peter TB Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: syntax-local-binding
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:26:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d3a9mjcy.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <we1md3a9pf3j.fsf@ssclt001.ee.surrey.ac.uk> (Peter TB Brett's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:30:40 +0000")
On Tue 24 Jan 2012 11:30, Peter TB Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk> writes:
> It seems pretty clear to me that the only (debatable) downside to using
> Mark's implementation is that some definitions end up in the "wrong"
> module, while your implementation has several potentially *major*
> problems (including the necessity of providing universally unique
> gensyms)
Let's be clear here: the universally-unique gensym issue is something
that Guile *already* has, in version 2.0.0, 2.0.1, etc.
Regards,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-24 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-15 17:00 syntax-local-binding Andy Wingo
2012-01-15 17:22 ` syntax-local-binding Andy Wingo
2012-01-19 11:41 ` syntax-local-binding Andy Wingo
2012-01-20 20:26 ` syntax-local-binding Mark H Weaver
2012-01-20 21:23 ` syntax-local-binding Andy Wingo
2012-01-20 22:03 ` syntax-local-binding Mark H Weaver
2012-01-22 0:03 ` syntax-local-binding Ludovic Courtès
2012-01-23 16:05 ` syntax-local-binding Andy Wingo
2012-01-23 21:03 ` syntax-local-binding Mark H Weaver
2012-01-23 22:19 ` syntax-local-binding Andy Wingo
2012-01-24 2:11 ` syntax-local-binding Mark H Weaver
2012-01-24 11:42 ` syntax-local-binding Andy Wingo
2012-01-24 17:29 ` syntax-local-binding Noah Lavine
2012-01-24 10:30 ` syntax-local-binding Peter TB Brett
2012-01-24 10:38 ` syntax-local-binding David Kastrup
2012-01-24 11:26 ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2012-01-24 13:25 ` syntax-local-binding Mark H Weaver
2012-01-24 20:28 ` mark uniqueness (Was: Re: syntax-local-binding) Andy Wingo
2012-01-25 0:26 ` mark uniqueness Mark H Weaver
2012-01-25 9:02 ` Andy Wingo
2012-01-24 21:22 ` syntax-local-binding Andy Wingo
2012-01-25 2:30 ` syntax-local-binding Mark H Weaver
2012-01-25 7:49 ` syntax-local-binding Stefan Israelsson Tampe
2012-01-25 11:18 ` syntax-local-binding Andy Wingo
2012-01-25 13:18 ` syntax-local-binding Ludovic Courtès
2012-01-25 18:08 ` syntax-local-binding Mark H Weaver
2012-01-26 11:21 ` syntax-local-binding Andy Wingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d3a9mjcy.fsf@pobox.com \
--to=wingo@pobox.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=peter@peter-b.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).