From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do you recognize these modules? Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:21:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87d342oja8.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <87zk9r8p1s.fsf@gnuvola.org> <8762bz89zg.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87r4unszj2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k40eg0k1.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87mx59kxqw.fsf@pobox.com> <87ehq8od4e.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87wr40s9yk.fsf@pobox.com> <87396onqi0.fsf@gnuvola.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341991308 5067 80.91.229.3 (11 Jul 2012 07:21:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 11 09:21:48 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SorF4-0001bo-H8 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:21:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56822 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SorF3-0000Nv-Iv for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:21:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45341) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SorEx-0000No-4D for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:21:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SorEq-0002MV-8l for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:21:38 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp207.alice.it ([82.57.200.103]:58022) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SorEj-0002K4-8b; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:21:25 -0400 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (79.30.64.196) by smtp207.alice.it (8.6.023.02) id 4FFCD13D0008EF46; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:21:04 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SorEO-0001EW-7R; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:21:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:02:29 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.103 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14739 Archived-At: () Noah Lavine () Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:02:29 -0400 What do you think? WRT style, the texi imported from 1.4 is littered w/ =E2=80=98@twerpdoc=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98@twerpmacdoc=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98@t= werpcommentary=E2=80=99 comments. IWBN to filter them before committing. WRT content, IIRC 1.4.x (ice-9 calling) was re{designed,written} so its documentation should not be imported w/o thorough review. E.g., 1.4 has and 1.8 lacks =E2=80=98save-bindings-excursion=E2=80=99. The= re are probably various other skewings (mostly additions, one hopes) in other modules, which need to be reconciled at some point, as well. (Maybe you know all this and are planning to make these changes in another patch set -- in that case, no worries, sorry for the noise!)