From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ian Price Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add ".guile.sls" and ".sls" to the default %load-extensions Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:56:18 +0000 Message-ID: <87d2zr1lt9.fsf@googlemail.com> References: <87fw4qgi1i.fsf@tines.lan> <87k3u16rak.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3u1knqn.fsf@delenn.lan> <87bofd6j24.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3u0kiny.fsf@delenn.lan> <87pq3s9j2b.fsf@gnu.org> <874nl3epxw.fsf@tines.lan> <87liefsqe0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352170598 9135 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2012 02:56:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 02:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mark H Weaver , guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 06 03:56:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TVZLE-00065f-UE for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 03:56:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVZL6-0002nA-3j for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:56:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53635) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVZL3-0002mu-Lj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:56:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVZL2-0001yD-N0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:56:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:38558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVZL2-0001y8-FY; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:56:28 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id p5so5251216lag.0 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:56:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=runfU9IlQn7bQECEP22BvDkwGYEcg1l0Xdkn5FqBc0A=; b=oaBcbKf+69ss6/aiozJL+IHWM6tVwV2WGQV8BJGBChZjewataN5nwpsQMAIpSsEuRE Z6DXjkjQ00wUlurKi7mx3BDVT8A7Bug/kT56vlAm59EBNutoVPGhQm1NLDIZ9BaE5m3T SfyRq6Ny1mEg4UyfBJC4gMVUQJR840Op/chqFd88AuS0cBo3kgkWXgsRRAR507WRNQbl /Mh+tR0byMkIDoa0ex5Y14cmhPUjcA6TJFM110cPrAgtrOe7oWHkm36Hwp8cISD1F36S 56VzOpyUisDCDrZbDMSfnlzWlN0atsVnG0BJwOEnOJuM0GhrDYvAl42RDo00jWhNP0Wv vZ0g== Original-Received: by 10.152.148.40 with SMTP id tp8mr10982254lab.30.1352170587198; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:56:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Kagami (host31-53-120-126.range31-53.btcentralplus.com. [31.53.120.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gt17sm6281188lab.6.2012.11.05.18.56.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:56:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87liefsqe0.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22's?= message of "Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:15:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.215.41 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15104 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: >> * Reject the dominant R6RS library naming convention, and force users >> and guildhall repository maintainers to rename the files to .scm and >> move *.guile.sls to *.scm. Based on Mark's prompting, I have already done this for a number of existing guildhall packages. In many cases it was pretty simple, in two particular cases, less so. > That would double that. > > This is likely to become noticeable with large $GUILE_LOAD_PATH values > and/or numerous module loads. Hopefully, one of the advantages of using the guildhall would be to shorten that path. Since libraries would usually be installed in guile's site directory, or guildhalls one. > WDYT? I'd prefer it was added, but I can live with it not being included. At Mark's request, I have changed existing uses of it in guildhall packages, so that 2.0.5 users don't need to do anything. R7RS will probably want its own incompatible convention anyway... --=20 Ian Price -- shift-reset.com "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"