From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Extra echo when using libguilereadline Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:23:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87d2c0wrlv.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> References: <83fvgwejxz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408191828 11482 80.91.229.3 (16 Aug 2014 12:23:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 16 14:23:41 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XId1D-0000h5-0F for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:23:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35329 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XId1C-0008Tp-DZ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:23:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XId17-0008Tk-JN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:23:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XId15-0002RC-HF for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:23:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]:43363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XId15-0002R4-90; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gl10so3054531lab.26 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 05:23:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=kNWR31XJkdjIQCt4Bn31cnviNP6v/p4KdGIVJA0kmn8=; b=tyu08zAHc9K7XbmkEW8E7U6doOeoyq8JyWE8MqHp7mZULHQnPk7FBQqX67vX2WkZZX BZX+mxdwwh+mJbztg5bNqlzqvQniIaEIQE1Tf5RGJ1oW6bGs8O44buN6rHby7Hikmt7T 0RqwFaQhXttfxMrM7FYZLYr2W0EHrbrB0BWT5qq3TJunmM0kMqj6nRKMG3chta0b+xlq E+ItGvTWfEbAc2f/1JWBjXYE6JFK5ccOJZWX5K25QC4GyrKBqglfesVvLwpjiBPT1TLS NLv/o5H0YIUlD4d1Q6lD5ytzVv8LFEvOiRBuA6iF4j+5dcqsbYRTmSjvg7PJFhEjZCeZ GYKg== X-Received: by 10.112.133.133 with SMTP id pc5mr1934606lbb.99.1408191806072; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 05:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from taylan.uni.cx (p200300514A44E2380213E8FFFEED36FB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:51:4a44:e238:213:e8ff:feed:36fb]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm6740156laa.44.2014.08.16.05.23.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Aug 2014 05:23:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83fvgwejxz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:46:16 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::235 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:17346 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I tried today the recipe from the manual that says how to load the > readline support: > > scheme@(guile-user)> ,m (ice-9 readline) > scheme@(ice-9 readline)> (activate-readline) > > This works, but has the side effect that everything I type is echoed > one more time, as shown below for 2 lines I typed: > > scheme@(ice-9 readline)> %load-path > %load-path > $1 = ("d:/usr/share/guile/2.0" "d:/usr/share/guile/site/2.0" "d:/usr/share/guile/site" "d:/usr/share/guile") > scheme@(ice-9 readline)> ,q > ,q > > Is this expected, or is this a bug? If the former, how can I disable > this double echo? On 2.0.11, I cannot reproduce this in any of xterm, M-x term, or M-x shell. It feels like a familiar issue though, probably under a peculiar setup; is there anything noteworthy about how you use the REPL, or your terminal emulator, or such? Taylan