From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: port initialization? Date: 10 Aug 2002 15:30:23 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87bs8a7seo.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <15693.15724.416839.636665@blauw.xs4all.nl> <15698.51215.103077.669940@blauw.xs4all.nl> <87lm7h2iu1.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <15698.55934.287636.6739@blauw.xs4all.nl> <87sn1pt5md.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <15698.64494.554986.819322@blauw.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028986219 9389 127.0.0.1 (10 Aug 2002 13:30:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17dWJt-0002RC-00 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 15:30:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17dWKg-00058G-00; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 09:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17dWK0-00057l-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 09:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17dWJz-00057Z-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 09:30:23 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip88.dokom.de ([195.138.42.88] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 17dWJy-00057U-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 09:30:22 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 32520 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Aug 2002 13:30:23 -0000 Original-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl In-Reply-To: <15698.64494.554986.819322@blauw.xs4all.nl> Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1054 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1054 Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > I took a look at the scm_memory_error() calls. From what I gather, > most of them are not really valid, in the sense that they often follow > malloc() calls (as opposed to scm_malloc) -- it might be that GC-ing > frees enough memory to satisfy the request. I see. So we should probably replace the calls to malloc with calls to scm_malloc. Anyone? :-) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel