From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: AARRRRGGH! Die Libtool, die! Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:28:51 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87bs15mtkc.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <200302151436.h1FEacTL013547@smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl> <87smupi86u.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <15950.54058.520676.489870@blauw.xs4all.nl> <200302160056.QAA15802@morrowfield.regexps.com> <878ywd5x4l.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <20030218185030.GB30623@www> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045848580 27861 80.91.224.249 (21 Feb 2003 17:29:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18mGzR-0007Ep-00 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:29:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18mGz0-0002Vr-09 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:29:10 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18mGyj-0002Va-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:28:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18mGyi-0002VK-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:28:53 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl093-098-016.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.98.16] helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18mGyi-0002VD-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:28:52 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA17B1833 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:28:51 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E1D93CBB6D; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:28:51 -0600 (CST) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030218185030.GB30623@www> (rm@fabula.de's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:50:30 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1957 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1957 rm@fabula.de writes: > How about 'gu', a really portable guile kernel that can be used to > bootstrap? It seems that a lot of the portability problems of 'sh' > are syntax / feature set problems. Wouldn't it be worth the effort > to work on a (non-interactive) guile-core shell? Sounds good to me in theory :> Though I haven't thought enough about it to have a good idea about what might be involved... -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel