From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Rottmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Segfault using call/cc on ia64 (and possibly others) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:46:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87brbijkw4.fsf@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> References: <873bwulq83.fsf@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> <87hdlae860.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1106358613 29896 80.91.229.6 (22 Jan 2005 01:50:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 01:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 22 02:50:06 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CsAPe-0003J0-00 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:50:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsAZB-0007hB-Ix for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:59:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsAYt-0007eE-96 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:59:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsAYj-0007Yq-8S for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:59:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsAYj-0007YX-2n for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:59:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsAMY-0002C1-96 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:46:54 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2005 01:46:53 -0000 Original-Received: from chello080109053157.14.14.univie.teleweb.at (EHLO garibaldi) (80.109.53.157) by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 22 Jan 2005 02:46:53 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3102804 Original-Received: from ivanova.rhinosaur.lan ([192.168.1.9] helo=ivanova) by garibaldi with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsAM8-0001hQ-UF; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:46:44 +0100 Original-Received: from andy by ivanova with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CsAMF-0004XM-AV; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:46:35 +0100 Original-To: Guile Developers , guile-bugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87hdlae860.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:20:23 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4720 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4720 Kevin Ryde writes: > Andreas Rottmann writes: >> >> Segfaults in the G-Wrap testsuite[0] seem to indicate that this might >> be a problem on alpha, > > Your one-liner seems ok for me on alpha. Propose something for the > test suite in any case. > This means I'm going to have to investigate this G-Wrap testsuite segfaults further on at least alpha and sparc. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann | Rotty@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel