From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: set-program-arguments from scheme Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:24:29 +1100 Message-ID: <87bql0ugoi.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87k5zqimya.fsf@zip.com.au> <87fyaemsmz.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168896294 22891 80.91.229.12 (15 Jan 2007 21:24:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 15 22:24:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H6ZJw-0004Si-W7 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:24:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6ZJw-0001dy-OL for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:24:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H6ZJs-0001dp-FZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:24:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H6ZJr-0001dK-BZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:24:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6ZJr-0001dF-6N for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:24:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.2.215] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H6ZJq-0004WR-Ns for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:24:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE0D5A3E73; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:24:41 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp275F.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.39.95]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5318C0C; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:24:40 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H6ZJd-0002ML-Hj; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:24:29 +1100 Original-To: Neil Jerram Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87fyaemsmz.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:08:52 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6426 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > > (I wondered about (set-program-arguments . lst) instead of > (set-program-arguments lst), but I suspect cases where you already > have a list in hand will be more common.) Yes, especially if you got it from a (program-arguments) call. >> + "Program arguments are held in a fluid and therefore have a\n" >> + "separate value in each Guile thread.") > > That's surprising; why is that? Tell me and we'll both know :). scm_boot_guile can be called in each thread with a different argc+argv, I suppose. I guess it lets you run each thread like it's a separate program, though that sounds like an unusual way to work. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel