From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: guile licensing niglets Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:08:45 +0000 Message-ID: <87bq7gkv4i.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87r6gckxoc.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <2bc5f8210801201318v10825f24k3c3246123450d52b@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200866948 18084 80.91.229.12 (20 Jan 2008 22:09:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development , Karl Berry To: "Julian Graham" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 20 23:09:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JGiLu-0000t2-UQ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:09:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGiLV-0001BD-JJ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:08:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JGiLR-00017e-Jb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:08:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JGiLP-00014K-V9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:08:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGiLP-00014C-Rw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:08:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JGiLP-0004Ja-JO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:08:47 -0500 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-145-183-175.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.183.175]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D5C1F6CA7; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:08:46 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from laruns (unknown [192.168.0.10]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF3C3800A; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:08:45 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <2bc5f8210801201318v10825f24k3c3246123450d52b@mail.gmail.com> (Julian Graham's message of "Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:18:52 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6967 Archived-At: "Julian Graham" writes: > Off-topic, but has there been any discussion of moving Guile to LGPLv3? Unless I get pressure to do this, I'd prefer to postpone this for now. There are other aspects of the Guile plan/roadmap/whatever that I'd like to get a grip on first. Philosophically/politically, I'm happy that LGPLv3 is the right move for Guile. Are there any practical considerations that would encourage us to do this sooner rather than later? Regards, Neil