From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: master build issue Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:49:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87bpp34tco.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87eiu07qse.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <87fxef4tvj.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1244161877 5129 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2009 00:31:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 05 02:31:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MCNKx-0003fK-L2 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:31:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57422 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCNKw-0004Zh-AA for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:31:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCMRJ-0008AN-T7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCMR8-000816-1u for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:33:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48121 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCMR7-0007rB-Cy for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:33:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:44195) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCJsq-00014F-B6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:49:56 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-152-99-133.range86-152.btcentralplus.com [86.152.99.133]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE78B1F9C51; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:49:46 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from arudy.ossau.uklinux.net (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9373801F; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:49:44 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87fxef4tvj.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Thu\, 04 Jun 2009 21\:38\:24 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8608 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > I'm also wondering if libtool v1.5.26 is a factor (as against v2.2) > - so now trying out libtool 2.2 from Debian testing. Yes, that seems to do the trick. So we require libtool 2.2 now... I guess that's OK, given that it's in Debian testing. (I'll make an appropriate update to HACKING.) Regards, Neil