From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Changing the signature of =?utf-8?b?4oCYdmhhc2gtYXNzb2PigJk=?= Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:26:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87bpa13tsg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wrszxpx9.fsf@gnu.org> <87oce8e7wa.fsf@gnu.org> <87iq49n3oj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279715202 18924 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2010 12:26:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 21 14:26:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObYNk-000634-4i for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:26:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41546 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObYNj-0000Js-GU for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:26:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56512 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObYNZ-0000I5-GW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:26:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObYNY-0002iA-6l for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:26:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:65338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObYNX-0002ho-UK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:26:28 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,238,1278280800"; d="scan'208";a="66759445" Original-Received: from laptop-147-210-128-193.labri.fr (HELO nixey) ([147.210.128.193]) by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 21 Jul 2010 14:26:26 +0200 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 Thermidor an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:38:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10713 Archived-At: Hi, Andy Wingo writes: > On Wed 21 Jul 2010 01:17, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >>>> Indeed, if =E2=80=98vhash-assoc=E2=80=99 et al. are changed to return = a vhash instead of >>>> a pair >>> >>> Thinking more about it, I think I=E2=80=99d rather keep =E2=80=98vhash-= assoc=E2=80=99 & co. as >>> they are, and add =E2=80=98vhash-assoc*=E2=80=99 & co., which would ret= urn a vhash. >> >> Commit 927bf5e8cc0af9515797ebab6d9ba162bef23c2a is roughly the original >> patch. > > Doesn't that impose an allocation penalty on vhash-assoc? No, it remains as before. The new =E2=80=98vhash-fold*=E2=80=99 does not a= llocate either. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.