From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile branch, master, updated. v2.1.0-102-g0f9f51a Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:36:45 -0500 Message-ID: <87boskzj8i.fsf@netris.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320899862 17392 80.91.229.12 (10 Nov 2011 04:37:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: "Andy Wingo" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 10 05:37:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ROMOP-0000zE-44 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:37:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ROMOO-0000KM-8K for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:37:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ROMOM-0000Jy-07 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:37:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ROMOK-0006AN-P0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:37:33 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:45756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ROMOK-00067P-Kg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:37:32 -0500 Original-Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ROMO4-0006rO-Nb; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:37:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:58:55 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 96.39.62.75 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12877 Archived-At: Hi Andy, > commit de41e56492666801078e73860a358e1c63cbc8c2 > Author: Andy Wingo > Date: Fri Nov 4 19:34:22 2011 +0100 > > hygienically rename macro-introduced bindings, reproducibly > > * module/ice-9/psyntax.scm (chi-top-sequence): Detect bindings to > identifiers introduced by macros. In that case, in order to preserve > hygiene, uniquify the variable's name, but in a way that is > reproduceable (i.e., yields the same uniquified name after a > recompile). What method do you use to uniquify a macro-introduced top-level name, such that a recompile yields the same name? I have doubts that this is possible without breaking hygiene in some cases. Mark