From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile: What's wrong with this? Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 01:01:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87boqj9fw2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4F027F35.5020001@gmail.com> <1325603029.22166.YahooMailNeo@web37906.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4F032C41.3070300@gmail.com> <87mxa4ifux.fsf@gnu.org> <4F038BF4.1070200@gnu.org> <87boqkgy3x.fsf@gnu.org> <4F03A396.8080404@gnu.org> <87zke3b211.fsf@gnu.org> <4F04D47F.50208@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325721690 22743 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2012 00:01:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 00:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Bruce Korb Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 05 01:01:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rialo-0004Ko-Pi for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 01:01:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56623 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rialo-0000Ex-DW for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:01:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rialm-0000Es-IQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:01:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rialk-0001CK-Bh for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:30786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rialk-0001C3-6K; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:01:20 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,459,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="125617183" Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 05 Jan 2012 01:01:18 +0100 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niv=F4se?= an 220 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <4F04D47F.50208@gnu.org> (Bruce Korb's message of "Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:36:47 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.134.164.105 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13311 Archived-At: Hi, Bruce Korb skribis: > On 01/04/12 13:17, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> If the users files are evaluated rather than compiled/loaded, this is >> not a problem: > > I do *all* guile processing via the ag_scm_c_eval_string_from_file_line > function. [...] >> Could you check whether this is the case? > > So it is the case. So this is good news: it means you only have to modify your own code without worrying about your users=E2=80=99 code (modulo the fact that modif= ying literals is still a bad idea, as others pointed out.) BTW, were you able to find a stripped-down example that reproduces the =E2=80=98string-upcase=E2=80=99 problem? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.