From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] tree-il->scheme improvements Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:10:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87boodd30s.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87hay728vi.fsf@netris.org> <874nu626oj.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330794644 29582 80.91.229.3 (3 Mar 2012 17:10:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 03 18:10:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S3sTj-0004jg-6R for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:10:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56897 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3sTi-0005PK-GV for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:10:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57975) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3sTM-0005JF-RL for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:10:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3sTK-0003Wb-S5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:10:20 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:48462 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3sTK-0003WD-J8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:10:18 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021349F2F; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:10:16 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=7fWr3eTVHeAotHfOe7E8zciKVCY=; b=QaDvX1 9v5F4McrGJ9okgrgKNoiDPBF5SDoOzKgI1RK/Zdgsj2qMxTsOUtkhhEY8a23YFUn MDSaHU3OP5858rVUSQcaCf3F+F00LqWFkIc5qqkslMJ8IV67TTIC8JtLqyz48cY0 8W+QyKLYuK3j9uWMFTBNQaUeAwLgVK/NpTBcQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=PJTVDziNhbCXEZeatmQUzHOp02+Hej/f Nz20ws5Y/ORqSomXcB84f1y1gFyLHkNT92253cNXV+PJfxJi1/e4TMRf78ev/FKp NKtMxNyWDfIBQMjKnXYZzmh+o7IAt+9dAfBI4CRb2ri0ESabtL5uSjmAOrT9dnmO 3dEuxgTnvtE= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2F39F2E; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:10:15 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E2499F2D; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:10:15 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <874nu626oj.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:34:20 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BEC8718E-6553-11E1-B018-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13988 Archived-At: Hi! Thanks for the excellent patches and rationale. On Fri 02 Mar 2012 19:34, Mark H Weaver writes: > Therefore, the relevant question here is: is there ever a case where > someone is going to call 'datum->syntax' on one of these introduced > syntax objects? Certainly not in psyntax-pp.scm, which is only ever used at boot time. Do you think it would be possible to get at these syntax objects at all? I am having a hard time seeing how it would be possible. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/