From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch? Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 23:57:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87bom6dz5j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vckf8ow1.fsf@gnuvola.org> <20120501235714.GOXX4.139112.root@cdptpa-web34-z02.mail.rr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335996019 2624 80.91.229.3 (2 May 2012 22:00:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 22:00:19 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 03 00:00:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPhar-0002C1-2f for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57337 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPhaq-00015g-Hr for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 18:00:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPhan-00015Z-90 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 18:00:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPhal-0006tj-4B for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 18:00:12 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPhak-0006tX-T0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 18:00:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPhai-00025w-Pz for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:08 +0200 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:08 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 14 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Flor=E9al?= an 220 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BKkzJ1XvPJR5m6H/Ua1BEyp1/4Y= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14335 Archived-At: Hi Noah, Noah Lavine skribis: > Yes, I was just wondering if that was the right place to send Guile > 1.8 bugfixes. I went ahead and committed two new fixes to that branch. > They both fix build errors on my system. Good. > Unfortunately, I also made a new branch in our repository called > 'release-1.8' because of a git error. It is an exact copy of that > branch. I want to remove the tag from the Savannah repository, because > it is useless and potentially very confusing. Is that the right thing > to do here? If so, is there a way to do it? Yes, please remove the ‘release-1.8’ branch. Something like ‘git push origin :release-1.8’ should work (search for “delete” in git-push(1).) Thanks, Ludo’.