From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Register VM WIP Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:45:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87bolpmgew.fsf@pobox.com> References: <871umqr8q0.fsf@pobox.com> <873972zczy.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337107579 8744 80.91.229.3 (15 May 2012 18:46:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andrew Gwozdziewycz Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 15 20:46:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMlB-0005Y2-1B for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:46:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMl9-0003sH-W2 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:46:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMl7-0003rI-9Y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:46:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMl5-0000xk-IQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:46806 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMl5-0000xe-9W; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B2F9DF0; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:46:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=WRHlWulltA07 rAKPHKICP16I8nk=; b=TJ/prowvyUzVg2C/l7Nkwwvf/t165FYVpOmwXdKTW7pM zNBJY1c/knMY2PUMmFKB2YHPX/HNPsRCNvpdE98hEVn8xR4ooN8cf+8tf6MiomN2 H6s+7rCoqwQh1SQvKXI8R9+5kB2OMUvd7/FlB8XvEupJDZXf0NQtX6sDsmpQg60= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=BdsMkk 7OXRZqOQu9BC9jH4QExGOHviMSAjxnmpZpFziRGleFUWWlLlKytuic+HkCi3Nx24 8aUmozWJVlbRvAwRBXpUePofivUaoYzGraGFcVy4NRTwCcGgy2s4wdST2x85I1nA rtJZ80g/8IQEYPSkvN9+u7mh/41ZKoMiubIIE= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4E69DEF; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:46:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C87C19DEE; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:46:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andrew Gwozdziewycz's message of "Mon, 14 May 2012 17:28:08 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 38AE5786-9EBE-11E1-BC59-E981AF15ED39-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14441 Archived-At: On Mon 14 May 2012 23:28, Andrew Gwozdziewycz writes: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrot= e: >> >> Presumably the tricky part will be the register allocator, right? > > The register based VMs I've seen ignore this issue by allowing for an > infinite set of registers. :) Indeed, that's the plan :) The first shot at an allocator will look a lot like the one in (language tree-il analyze). Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/