From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Documenting (system repl server) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:35:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87boa4h6fv.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87hak8r0qm.fsf@Kagami.home> <871ub0r1km.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364420153 1519 80.91.229.3 (27 Mar 2013 21:35:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 27 22:36:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UKy13-0000Bo-1l for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:36:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35737 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKy0e-0007W0-Ra for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:35:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46227) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKy0T-0007Vq-0i for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:35:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKy0R-0000zx-RF for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:38106 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKy0R-0000zs-NS; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:35:39 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214D4B2F3; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:35:39 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=pPJqFix94WMk +gsyKpuKHtJNpg4=; b=VLbTa/rX8IAaJRg8M/Y5Fa0M3CsAFDZgq5YXwPntPcVw Mnuant45L2lFX4C7YQS+lCGRVVaoVj/zSlaekSQNUtm04OCkLX0sDcpnI2IxMC95 Yt7ZjZuiCs1BpGyoeBV/eDNPpLOIdUL/NcCy2wNnddfwovABNIo3CdvrUWZJLVw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mP5Opm ASCewuNM6DKkUN1ZhP0p/7pOBO4UKTR3sssMAwEd9tJ6Eal912S8pshraLmefTiY 9oVxEMJtRKYgpr8MQrV5HjT+huc4sni8EpimYVrwC4VfpzozJuYIXaT8HsIkwAH9 6qd83bXF9iQVSw4g4TFhj05k7FhacqbBUKcCY= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1828FB2F2; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:35:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AD04B2F1; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:35:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871ub0r1km.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:10:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 446B8FE2-9726-11E2-9E1C-D36F0E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 208.72.237.25 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16037 Archived-At: On Wed 27 Mar 2013 22:10, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Thanks for working on this! Indeed. Incidentally I think it would be a good idea to default to using named pipes. Not sure we can change that in 2.0, but having a locally open TCP port to a shell is a security risk if you run a web browser on that same machine: http://wingolog.org/archives/2013/02/04/knocking-on-private-back-doors-wi= th-the-web-browser Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/