From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: 2.2.0 release plan Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:01:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmt37vhq.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489503800 28941 195.159.176.226 (14 Mar 2017 15:03:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 15:03:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 14 16:03:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cnnyi-0006kL-8f for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:03:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59984 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnnyo-00057R-DC for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:03:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnnxP-0004As-Rf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:01:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnnxL-0001v3-0y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:01:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:50191 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cnnxK-0001ul-Ta for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:01:46 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049BB69C23 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:01:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=g Z6bnFGD0yzAWqvKzSLcWLx5BdA=; b=VP5v9ub8dPKKZ1c52F0+9SxkVdGlmAfuv rjOk0COM1pKl7eymKc/C3dGOTMQNwelnPKXBuDxDORUb/IUcc0HMWyXD0J50JQsF jPxMjFuR1kNLMKTN7ncZmJxGE0HoOHSpoi06sdPKen3kXXP7cbk417074w6cpnna p0U031/ZZk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Wad qZUHgKSUrlxI9TB7+ZwzIU0TqR7kvgmpAglWj8zBPlkEQC/jFQ8yZPCzFbEzOhmq mz7uQr59Xk+jKaeH1XoAXi8M5N0kCupMnzUtaukoQgUyFMAcug1JbMBGHPvDJmHT 3T5Xtv1z0iJ17MeIlXAO+BwIgmdaG8Mwi64lm2Qo= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26A669C22 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:01:44 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4762669C21 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:01:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2370315A-08C7-11E7-A047-B667064AB293-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.108.66 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:19045 Archived-At: Hi, I think we are ready to go for 2.2.0. I am going to make a provisional 2.2.0 tag today and update the version. I will dist a tarball and upload to somewhere provisional. However! Even though the code says 2.2.0 and the tag says 2.2.0, the release is not until Thursday. I will not upload the tag yet. This will give us a chance to update the web site, prepare nice release notes, make a binary build using the new "guix pack", and test everything out. It could be we find some showstopper like a libtool age issue or something. If that's the case, we can fix it and re-spin a release. Since I won't have uploaded the tag, all should be good. Thoughts welcome :) Andy