From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ricardo Wurmus Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile 3 and wip-elisp/Emacs Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 19:34:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87bl3rtsiq.fsf@elephly.net> References: <871r5ti5k4.fsf@dustycloud.org> <47-61683800-21-6332ae00@62794253> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36982"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.6.5; emacs 27.2 Cc: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Gregg Sangster Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 14 19:42:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mb4kR-0009Nd-7j for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 19:42:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59448 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mb4kP-0003Uh-LA for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 13:42:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mb4i1-0001Ec-Ry for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 13:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mb4hx-0000kl-3a for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 13:40:00 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634233190; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=hRMmhDxKcxXbvZYqVmVLN1CrleUdeBqzKBrGxM1R4qMtNER0gamFBbeQvkpZGYyMf0nojL+nxno3hvVPU/qicqgUVfnEvkmPOfvFDJrC1WhvbnTMHxfmO3wlAVF4Rpe80G3jrKkiuzTkit/RhV+FTZq+dCSme8NU7zYtIYwlBsk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1634233190; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=ErkOhaJDuhh9JLgdjFeiXDompvlo3jfKR80AP6LoSy8=; b=STQzrQxPeAPdfUvN9qYbfg9VIu+cQhdFtnyFsUVYtS5sl5EnRK0U++ijvFIHLjESHM/9aOPQ535H0a6LdKOMRkQJk48C0AaNpNdJy45Pk7VXzYCmuajBSKWGouGHwIVwmYXhRW1E9PMei5msBnpVRKsKavSnIJVz9T3jyH1Wl+o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1634233190; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=ErkOhaJDuhh9JLgdjFeiXDompvlo3jfKR80AP6LoSy8=; b=ioL8f7jJ/SUonDJHbbjHkTipAVDpB2TaPBzjYDd48vp9ewjypRvfBeIB+/+CCNCS OPmdngaWZ7S+tat1A1GVDSg0+mOxNnmqFNXFXUO6nPVenPsXvGWI8wf0YjedjLY8+nP W6vsbnlWis0av5iTL1cx9rZM7Fw3daDo7rmoKZKc= Original-Received: from localhost (p54ad48e5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.72.229]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1634233187224831.7914708749242; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 10:39:47 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <47-61683800-21-6332ae00@62794253> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:20915 Archived-At: Hi Gregg, "Gregg Sangster" writes: > I have wip-elisp rebased all the way up to main as of a few days=20 > ago (e60469c8b6936575c079faaffa40a340e1d49f3c) plus two changes=20 > from Ricardo. It's available here: > > https://git.sr.ht/~g20r/guile Excellent! > There is one test failure in "make check" on test-out-of-memory.=20 > I > haven't investigated it yet but I get the same failure on main.=20 > If > that's not an expected failure, it might be a problem with my > environment. > > There is also an emacs repo here: > > https://git.sr.ht/~g20r/emacs > > which uses the 3.0-based wip-elisp. It builds and runs but=20 > segfaults easily. I've started rebasing it on a more current=20 > emacs. Those changes aren't published yet. I also had he same experience. Guile Emacs would segfault very=20 quickly. That=E2=80=99s why I started a rebase on top of the nearest=20 Emacs release, which is 25.2. I had to abandon the rebase,=20 because after about 45 commits it became too difficult for me to=20 understand what exactly I had to do to resolve all these=20 conflicts. There are about 112 commits left to apply. If you think you could benefit from the work I already did I could=20 upload the full git repo as it is, mid-rebase and all. > I haven't been able to get the guile-emacs package in guix=20 > working. > The build gets stuck at collecting/processing OKURI-NASI entries=20 > after > a few hours. For comparison, the 3.0-based guile-emacs builds=20 > in > about 20 minutes on my machine. If anyone has that running, it=20 > would > be nice to have a comparison of the build/run speed. I only got the 2.x-based Guile Emacs to build. Haven=E2=80=99t tried with= =20 3.x because I had not dared rebase beyond 2.2. --=20 Ricardo