From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile 1.5.6 beta available for testing. Date: 15 Mar 2002 21:54:45 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87adt9mu0a.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016225717 25995 127.0.0.1 (15 Mar 2002 20:55:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 20:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Guile Mailing List Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16lyjN-0006lB-00 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 21:55:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16lyiP-0002cY-00; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:54:17 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip89.dokom.de ([195.138.42.89] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16lygt-0002WU-00 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:52:44 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 1324 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Mar 2002 20:54:45 -0000 Original-To: Steve Tell In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:69 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:69 Steve Tell writes: > As near as I can tell by wading through the libtool script and sh -x > output, libtool adds "-L/usr/lib" because libguile.la says that libguile > needs /usr/lib/libltdl.la, and /usr/lib/libltdl.a says that libltdl has > its further dependendencies specified as "-ldl" (instead of as an absolute > path to a libdl.la?) Ahh, that makes sense. That is, it explains what you are seeing, but it certainly looks wrong. > I'm temporarily joining the libtool list to see if any of the > experts can shed some light. It definitely looks like libtool is > doing the wrong thing, or at least a less correct thing. Yes, I'll listen in to the discussion on the libtool list... _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel