From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: guile/workbook/extension/dynamic-root.text Date: 04 Jun 2002 01:16:16 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87adqcj6m7.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <200205291947.MAA00476@onyx.he.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023146332 16055 127.0.0.1 (3 Jun 2002 23:18:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 23:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17F16C-0004Aj-00 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2002 01:18:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17F15S-0008PP-00; Mon, 03 Jun 2002 19:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip31.dokom.de ([195.138.42.31] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17F13h-0008MA-00 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2002 19:16:17 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 1812 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Jun 2002 23:16:16 -0000 Original-To: Gary Houston In-Reply-To: <200205291947.MAA00476@onyx.he.net> Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:689 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:689 Gary Houston writes: > This file expands (excessively, perhaps) on the call-with-dynamic-root > problem that has been mentioned on the mailing lists a few times. I > hope somebody can review the conclusions some time in the next > few months. Looks very good to me, on the first read. One thing that popped into my mind is that you talk about continuations _and_ exceptions. I think we should also work towards unifying continuations and exceptions so that there is only one underlying mechanism for non-local jumps. More later... _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel