From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Updating NEWS for 1.6.8 release. Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:29:16 -0700 Message-ID: <87ach880ar.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <87br1qr52s.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87k6gefohb.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <874q7ip37b.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <877jcdb3ja.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87psq5awmb.fsf@zip.com.au> <87y84s82ju.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129573801 22499 80.91.229.2 (17 Oct 2005 18:30:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 17 20:29:59 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERZji-0001VK-5V for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:29:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERZjh-00067H-JN for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:29:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ERZjc-000673-Uu for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:29:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ERZjb-00066p-E3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:29:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERZjb-00066m-AG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [70.85.129.156] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ERZjb-0003ag-Cm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4907690D36; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:29:18 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A8740F3; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2C3924102A; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: <87y84s82ju.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:40:37 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5303 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > Yes, for `(call/cc make-stack)'. make-stack is supposed to be able to > construct a stack from a continuation, a debug object, or from `#t', > which means the current evaluation stack. But the make-stack code was > missing a lot of the relocations that are needed in the > continuation case. The symptom was a segmentation fault. > > I forget now exactly how I discovered this, though. Is it worth me > trying to dig that up? Not as far as I'm concerned, though would a trivial NEWS entry be appropriate? i.e. perhaps something like ** make-stack can now correctly construct a stack from a continuation. if that's correct. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel