From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm. Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:06:54 -0800 Message-ID: <87acg03z69.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <878xvpupx0.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87psoyhan9.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87u0e8afak.fsf@zagadka.de> <87veyoik74.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87acg0gvq0.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87y83kyzs4.fsf@zagadka.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132448860 24609 80.91.229.2 (20 Nov 2005 01:07:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 01:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 20 02:07:37 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eddfb-0005b3-BJ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:07:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eddfa-00010T-MS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EddfW-00010O-MO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:06:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EddfV-00010C-4A for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:06:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EddfV-000108-0e for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [70.85.129.156] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EddfU-00022M-T0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF58190D2B; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:06:59 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AC83F4A; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:06:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02A0A3C30E2; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:06:54 -0800 (PST) Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87y83kyzs4.fsf@zagadka.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "Sun, 20 Nov 2005 01:38:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5413 Archived-At: Marius Vollmer writes: > Whenever we want to do things differently, we should push those > changes into SLIB. Certainly. That's what I assume we're trying to determine here. i.e. are there any changes in the current slib.scm that haven't made it upstream, but should? For example, aside from the "eval in interaction-environment vs slib" issue, see also the comments in slib.scm regarding *features* and slib:load. Do we need or want to preserve any of those changes? -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel