From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] scm_module_variable, duplicate bindings handlers Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:08:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87absv94zv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87sl6rn2b4.fsf@pobox.com> <873ayrh250.fsf@chbouib.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186996107 20574 80.91.229.12 (13 Aug 2007 09:08:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 13 11:08:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IKVuO-0000Dg-VJ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:08:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKVuO-0005L5-Ej for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:08:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKVuF-0005ID-Dj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKVuE-0005Go-Dn for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:08:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKVuE-0005GQ-3H for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:08:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IKVuC-0005fR-S8; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:08:09 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-145-176-36.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.176.36]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C8340A334; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (unknown [192.168.0.5]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD5F38009; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:08:04 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <873ayrh250.fsf@chbouib.org> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?s's?= message of "Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:53:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6682 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > So both patches make sense. Agreed, but you may also want to write some tests, to check and document the behaviour that you expect for guile-gnome. Otherwise there's nothing to catch someone accidentally reverting this change again. Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel