From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: 2.0.x branched! Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:37:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87aahtm63o.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87sjvpguvj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298061525 10650 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2011 20:38:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 18 21:38:41 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqX68-0001Rc-N2 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:38:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40515 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqX68-0005tL-2I for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:38:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38906 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqX60-0005t2-P3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:38:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqX5z-0001ZM-UX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:38:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:60363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqX5z-0001Qb-PQ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:38:31 -0500 Original-Received: from arudy (unknown [78.145.24.37]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEAF1F6636; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:37:53 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from neil-laptop (unknown [192.168.11.4]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5484338013; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:37:52 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87sjvpguvj.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:50:08 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-Received-From: 80.84.72.33 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11658 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Hello! > > There=E2=80=99s now a =E2=80=98stable-2.0=E2=80=99 branch! > > We=E2=80=99re releasing in less than 24 hours so normally nothing will be= pushed > there. :-) Now that 2.0.0 is out, I presume the general procedure from now on should be: - committing safe 2.0.x stuff (in particular, as far as I'm concerned, docs) to the stable-2.0 branch - committing anything else to master - periodically merging from stable-2.0 to master. Is that right? Neil