From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: The dynamic stack
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 00:09:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87aa3sc8ky.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vcmh1nd2.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:32:57 +0100")
Hi!
Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> skribis:
> On Tue 06 Mar 2012 18:20, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> skribis:
>>
>>> I have pushed a patch to master that changes the implementation of the
>>> dynamic stack
>>
>> The “dynwind stack” actually (I misread it the first time.)
>
> Yes, it did have this name before. (More often, "the wind list".) But
> since "dynwind" is overloaded so much (dynamic-wind operator, <dynwind>,
> scm_dynwind_*), and the dynamic stack can have other things on it like
> prompts, I thought it best to give it a new name.
Indeed, very good point.
That said, when I first saw the topic, I was expecting something about
the VM stack, which could now be grown dynamically upon stack overflow.
:-)
Now, what would be a better name? As you say, in an ideal world,
there’d be only one stack so...
>> Could you please add comments in dynstack.c (above each function), and
>> make sure to follow GCS-style (no hanging brace, for example)?
>
> What do you mean by "no hanging brace"?
Anything reported by:
grep -nH -e '[[:graph:]]\+[[:blank:]]*{$' *.[ch]
such as:
typedef enum {
SCM_DYNSTACK_TYPE_NONE = 0,
SCM_DYNSTACK_TYPE_FRAME,
SCM_DYNSTACK_TYPE_UNWINDER,
SCM_DYNSTACK_TYPE_REWINDER,
SCM_DYNSTACK_TYPE_WITH_FLUIDS,
SCM_DYNSTACK_TYPE_PROMPT,
SCM_DYNSTACK_TYPE_DYNWIND,
} scm_t_dynstack_item_type;
Also, “Don't declare both a structure tag and variables or typedefs in
the same declaration” (info "(standards) Syntactic Conventions").
> What sorts of comments would you like to see? I have been working with
> this code a lot, so perhaps some things which are obvious to me from
> names, types, assertions, etc that might not actually be obvious. I
> don't see what I can write that isn't wholly redundant. Perhaps you
> will let me know :-)
Comments above functions would be nice. For instance, I can’t tell what
this does:
scm_t_dynstack *
scm_dynstack_capture (scm_t_dynstack *dynstack, scm_t_bits *item)
A two-line comment above mentioning DYNSTACK and ITEM would be great
(info "(standards) Comments"). (And we could use the neat
M-x semantic-ia-show-doc, which gives a Geiser feel to this dull C
world. ;-))
And I think it wouldn’t be redundant for many/most of the functions in
that file.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-03 16:25 The dynamic stack Andy Wingo
2012-03-06 17:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-06 20:32 ` Andy Wingo
2012-03-07 6:05 ` Noah Lavine
2012-03-07 9:51 ` Andy Wingo
2012-03-07 23:09 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87aa3sc8ky.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=wingo@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).