From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Christopher Allan Webber Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: guile 3 desires: guile-3-0, and debugging Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:42:24 -0600 Message-ID: <87a7zbxmzj.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1511566968 27202 195.159.176.226 (24 Nov 2017 23:42:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 23:42:48 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.3.1 Cc: guile-devel To: Matt Wette Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 25 00:42:44 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eINcF-0006Ol-Lf for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 00:42:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51457 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eINcM-0004dU-Tt for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:42:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eINcG-0004dN-GZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:42:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eINcF-00030J-T0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:42:40 -0500 Original-Received: from dustycloud.org ([2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51]:55380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eINcF-0002z8-Nx for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:42:39 -0500 Original-Received: from oolong (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22BE7266EE; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:42:38 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:19388 Archived-At: Matt Wette writes: > Here are a couple desires: > > 1) more cases for cond-expand, in case 3.2 has items 3.0 does not (e.g., srfi-199) > > 2) better debugging. > Maybe I'm not doing it right, but I struggle in this area: I mostly resort to printing. > For example, add scheme level hook, or command arg, to turn off optimization. You aren't alone... read this thread: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-05/msg00068.html And Andy's suggestion of what we need to do to make it better: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-05/msg00070.html