Re: Guile 64-bit Windows support, redux

["Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab@web.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 951 bytes --]


Jonas Hahnfeld via "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" <guile-devel@gnu.org> writes:
>> What do you and others think of this approach, would this be "more"
>> acceptable to land in main?
>
> Ping, any comments on this approach? I built binaries for LilyPond
> 2.25.10 using these patches applied on top of Guile 3.0.9 and the
> result seems to work fine on Windows.

It sounds very interesting to me, but sadly I’m not in a position to
judge what’s acceptable to land. Still I didn’t want to leave you
without an answer, because I am very happy to see you work on this!

And making life easier for lilypond is great!

From what I’ve seen, the maintainers (Ludo and Andy) have been under
pretty high load the last months, so that may explain why there was no
answer to your email from end of october.

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 1125 bytes --]