From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: bug#73605: [PATCH] Replace SRFI-64 with a new implementation. Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 21:24:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87a5eylgrf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20241002194105.24409-1-~@wolfsden.cz> <87o73nrchr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34933"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel@gnu.org, 73605-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Rob Browning To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 20 21:24:40 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t2bXb-0008tr-0C for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 21:24:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t2bXN-0006yf-Op; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 15:24:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t2bXL-0006yQ-5o for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 15:24:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t2bXK-0008TL-UK; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 15:24:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=GIuKbga+2rH0z5fSKg8OFJYz5IMB5oAy3hPE6UCZdfo=; b=mnNoCSkZxge+vrhEvbsK lqji/qWPMEzamuyg/jzz/86V5zGTO/XWYI29aOzSMK6+mqwYQoDVJ1hl67i+dvSKOOcXxezdFTpQW 05p4mw8/BghhCRseMQO16iR8pFrtEoxt3YE6sOz3U4kMK2hYZZQ5PMLmkjPWsQTVFxjqeSoytZouY 7OsJyVRqCV1yparn99qLltUBjTCzAeAKnwMyFKoHPV21vVJwXipvulA26WmNF+zr6i7VTyByWLy3P Se0eTtFwBHR74SVz2MgJ0bdVP/ALGuwBgtOaUPqC9mj40uWJqhAFn/Ra1ks+p5vUsF3vWf5rupr6D LuOaYNxzcL8DwQ==; In-Reply-To: <87o73nrchr.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:09:36 +0200") X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:22742 Archived-At: Hi, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis: > >> The bundled (reference) implementation was of somewhat mixed quality and >> it failed to follow standard in multiple places. This commit replaces >> it with a new one, written from scratch to follow the standard as close >> as possible. >> >> * module/srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm: Delete file. >> * module/srfi/srfi-64.scm: Replace with new implementation. >> * am/bootstrap.am (srfi/srfi-64.go): Remove extra dependencies. >> (NOCOMP_SOURCES): Remove srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm. >> * test-suite/tests/srfi-64-test.scm >> ("8.6.1. Simple (form 1) test-apply") >> ("8.6.2. Simple (form 2) test-apply"): Adjust tests to follow the >> specification. [...] > Everyone, please speak up if you object. If there are no objections > within a week or so, I=E2=80=99d like to apply it. Pushed as ad90f45a8c4fd00add44c214863850a425f787a0, thanks Tomas! Ludo=E2=80=99.