From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Regarding (bug "versioning-of-extensions") Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:49:42 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <878z88c6ix.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87eli4bcx4.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <871ye0f9i1.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017640277 22765 127.0.0.1 (1 Apr 2002 05:51:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 05:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16ruiq-0005v3-00 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2002 07:51:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16ruid-0000ZZ-00; Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:51:03 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16ruhL-0000TI-00 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:49:43 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCD5353E for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:49:42 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E54EB2120; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:49:42 -0600 (CST) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <871ye0f9i1.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Sun, 31 Mar 2002 20:17:10 -0600") Original-Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:249 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:249 Rob Browning writes: > Unless there are objections, I think I'm going to leave the number > alone, i.e. use 15, even though due to AGE the actual lib major > version might be smaller, for example 13, but I'll change the naming > scheme like this > > libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-lt15 Actually, I decided to go with the most explicit libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-lt-15-0-2.so.X.Y.Z This means that people won't have to guess which number the "lt" number is -- it's just the actual libtool var numbers CURRENT-REVISION-AGE (which are the only ones we can determine programatically), and it also means that if someone wanted to, they could, given a set of libfoo libs named this way, apply the same algorithm that libtool uses to figure out which, if any, satisfies a given interface -- i.e. doesn't hurt, might help :> As before, let me know if you see a problem. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel