From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: anti-spam measures Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 02:39:51 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <878yjyqg48.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <6.0.1.1.2.20040123165735.0313b428@einfo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1074908634 26253 80.91.224.253 (24 Jan 2004 01:43:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 24 02:43:48 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AkCpw-0001X4-00 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 02:43:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AkCpG-0003NA-78 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:43:06 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AkCo4-0002aA-5h for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:41:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AkCnW-0001xv-7N for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:41:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1AkCnV-0006HP-Pm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:41:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.253.8.218] (helo=mail.dokom.net) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AkCmA-0006bz-UG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:39:55 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway43.dip186.dokom.de ([195.138.43.186] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 1AkCn1-0003Ot-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 02:40:48 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 16437 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Jan 2004 01:39:52 -0000 Original-To: Byron Hale In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.2.20040123165735.0313b428@einfo.com> (Byron Hale's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:59:22 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3305 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3305 Byron Hale writes: > I notice that the Guile-developers list does not have any > identifying header. Doesn't the header "To: guile-devel@gnu.org" suffice? Also, we have List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , all of which could be used to identify messages to the list. > Secondarily, I have put restrictive filters on domain name recipients. > Later I plan to remove my current email address. Before I do that, > I want to see my lists do something like make it difficult to harvest > email addresses from lists. That could be by mangling the return > address so that human intervention was needed. I don't understand. Should the list reflector on the GNU machines mangle your From: header? Can't you do that yourself when sending to the list? The archives hide your email address already. > Any list that does not adopt these measures will ultimately be dropped. > I just can't take so much SPAM, 4 or 5 times the volume of email > that can efficiently be handled.. I use bogofilter with great success. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel