From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:41:02 +1100 Message-ID: <878xulan6p.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87wti7pwie.fsf@laas.fr> <87ek4ftgge.fsf@zagadka.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134693818 17804 80.91.229.2 (16 Dec 2005 00:43:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 16 01:43:33 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1En3fz-0004VA-1E for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 01:42:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1En3ge-0000qt-E5 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1En3fg-0000kt-WD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1En3fe-0000jB-38 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:42:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1En3fd-0000if-FS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.84] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1En3hx-0004Tz-IS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:44:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.87]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBG0fCYC008892; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:41:12 +1100 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2317.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.35.23]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBG0f6db005442; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:41:11 +1100 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1En3eh-0001pJ-00; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:41:03 +1100 Original-To: Marius Vollmer Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87ek4ftgge.fsf@zagadka.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:19:13 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5528 Archived-At: Marius Vollmer writes: > > Yep. But what about an inline function? There is some machinery in > inline.h for this and we already use it for scm_cell, for example. Was some of the change to scm_is_whatever meant to keep the representation of an SCM value out of application binaries? I lost track of what it was supposed to be doing. :) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel